A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
It has been established through the Supreme Court of this nation that it is an individual right to keep and bear arms. This includes on your person, in your car, in your home, etc. so long as you are a law-abiding citizen and are using the firearm for lawful purposes (such as self-defense and defense of your home).
The government needs to back off all their anti-gun stances. Who are they to challenge the Supreme Court and the Constitution of this United States? Hillary, take notes, because that Small Arms Treaty is against our rights to keep and bear even pistols.
In Heller, the Court held that (1) the District of Columbia’s total ban on handgun possession in the home amounted to a prohibition on an entire class of “arms” that Americans overwhelmingly chose for the lawful purpose of self-defense, and thus violated the Second Amendment; and (2) the District’s requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock also violated the Second Amendment, because the law made it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense.
For someone without a law degree, I find it hard to believe that I am more informed on our Constitution than the Secretary of State. Or the President, or any other anti-gun lobbyist or Congressman.
It is absurd. We the people will not allow our guns to be taken.
Numquam Cede, Libertatem aut mors